Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects

Optimize reading RT130 data

Merged Kien Le requested to merge enhancement-RT130_read_performance into develop
4 unresolved threads

Some tests on large data sets:

Old code New code
9BB3_D1.cf 156.14s 32.83s
2016174.9AC4 62.38s 13.61s

Some tests on single files:

Old code New code
9BB3_D1.cf/2016326/9BB3/0/000000000_00000000 0.00287s 0.00135s
9BB3_D1.cf/2016327/9BB3/1/030000000_0036EE80 0.177s 0.033s
2016174.9AC4/2016187/9AC4/9/053550000_013EE8A0 0.0026s 0.0013s

Merge request reports

Pipeline #3848 passed

Pipeline passed for 8535b5c5 on enhancement-RT130_read_performance

Merged by Kien LeKien Le 10 months ago (Apr 24, 2024 10:58pm UTC)

Merge details

  • Changes merged into with 9e6e3604.
  • Deleted the source branch.

Pipeline #3849 passed

Pipeline passed for 9e6e3604 on develop

Activity

Filter activity
  • Approvals
  • Assignees & reviewers
  • Comments (from bots)
  • Comments (from users)
  • Commits & branches
  • Edits
  • Labels
  • Lock status
  • Mentions
  • Merge request status
  • Tracking
363 357 self.log_data[cur_data_set_id]['SOH'] = []
364 358 self.log_data[cur_data_set_id]['SOH'].append((d['time'], logs))
365 359
366 def read_eh_or_et_packet(self, rt130: core.Reftek130) -> None:
360 def read_eh_or_et_packet(self, rt130: core.DecimatedReftek130) -> None:
  • 394 388 self.get_mass_pos_data_and_waveform_data(
    395 389 rt130, data_stream, cur_data_set_id)
    396 390
    397 def get_ehet_in_log_data(self, rt130: core.Reftek130,
    391 def get_ehet_in_log_data(self, rt130: core.DecimatedReftek130,
  • 419 413 (d['time'], logs))
    420 414
    421 415 def get_mass_pos_data_and_waveform_data(
    422 self, rt130: core.Reftek130, data_stream: int,
    416 self, rt130: core.DecimatedReftek130, data_stream: int,
    • Maintainer
      Resolved by Lan Dam

      Look great. I just need a call with you so you can explain in detail what is happening in _decimate_waveform_data().

  • Kien Le added 4 commits

    added 4 commits

    Compare with previous version

    • Maintainer

      Can you also remove the 'core.' I mentioned above because you already imported DecimateReftek130. I pre-approve this because this work is simple.

    • Author Developer

      core is used somewhere else in the code. That's why I didn't remove it.

    • Maintainer

      But because you imported DecimateReftek130 why don't you use rt130:DecimateReftek130 instead of rt130:core.DecimateReftek130?

    • Author Developer

      Oops, look like I didn't commit the code where I changed this. Apologies.

    • Please register or sign in to reply
  • Lan Dam approved this merge request

    approved this merge request

  • Kien Le added 1 commit

    added 1 commit

    • 65ba2b21 - Remove unneeded package reference

    Compare with previous version

  • Kien Le reset approvals from @ldam by pushing to the branch

    reset approvals from @ldam by pushing to the branch

  • Lan Dam approved this merge request

    approved this merge request

  • Kien Le added 67 commits

    added 67 commits

    Compare with previous version

  • Kien Le enabled an automatic merge when the pipeline for 8535b5c5 succeeds

    enabled an automatic merge when the pipeline for 8535b5c5 succeeds

  • merged

  • Kien Le mentioned in commit 9e6e3604

    mentioned in commit 9e6e3604

  • Please register or sign in to reply
    Loading